The GTX 1660 is back on top for our Star Wars Battlefront II testing, sitting between the RX 590 and GTX 1070, with 85 fps on average it’s in a category of its own. We plan to retest these GPUs with DX12 just to make sure. That’s how the GeForce GTX 1660 Ti stacks up in a wide range of games and it was interesting to see where it offered big gains over GPUs such as the GTX 1060 6GB, and then others where the gains were less impressive. Of course, if you have anything faster than a GTX 1060 or RX 580, such as Vega 56 or the GTX 1070, there’s still no worthwhile upgrade choice if you want best value for your money. Nvidia GeForce GTX 1660 Ti review: The new benchmark for flawless 1080p gaming - Rock Paper Shotgun. Then at 1440p we find a similar situation, where the 1660 was 17% faster than the RX 590 and 22% faster than the 6GB GTX 1060. The 1660 Ti also roughly matched the GTX 1070 Ti and was just 5% slower than the GTX 1080. We’ve already seen how Warframe runs better with Pascal GPUs. This GPU is finally down to the price it should have launched at. If you enjoy our content, please consider subscribing... You need to be a member to leave a comment. It’s just that in this case we’re pitting a 1920 CUDA core Pascal part against a 1536 CUDA core Turing part. Drivers used include the AMD Adrenalin 2019 Edition 19.2.3 for the Radeon GPUs and Game Ready 419.35 WHQL for the GeForce cards. To Vsync or Not to Vsync? At 1440p we see a slight shift in the results. You’re looking at performance somewhere between a GTX 1070 and 1070 Ti. So those two are more evenly matched now. Nvidia GTX 1660 Ti review: Turing rising from the RTX ashes with the Asus Phoenix - PCGamesN. © 2021 TechSpot, Inc. All Rights Reserved. F1 fans will enjoy what the GTX 1660 has to offer. Essentially you can save ~10% on the cost of the graphics card to have 10% of the performance shaved off. If you read our GTX 1660 Ti review from days prior, the change here is very small at ~2-4 fps for the most part. AMD acknowledges USB connectivity issues on X570 and B550 motherboards, Asus ROG Zephyrus Duo GX551 Review: an ambitious dual-screen gaming laptop. Things become a little more challenging at 1440p, but even so the GTX 1660 was good for a 1% low of 90 fps with an average frame rate of 109 fps. To give you a better idea of how these two GPUs and more compare in a wide range of games, we put together this 33 game benchmark. We added 175MHz to the core to boost the EVGA GTX 1660 Ti XC’s clocks above 2050MHz. Still overall performance at 1440p was good and the new affordable Turing GPU also edged out the RX 590. That figure has dropped quite a bit in the 33 game comparison, now the 1660 Ti is just 34% faster, though still a decent margin. In The Witcher 3 the 1660 Ti matches the GTX 1070 as it often does. The reason for this is down to the more limited game selection that purely by chance were more favorable to the Turing GPU. © 2021 TechSpot, Inc. All Rights Reserved. It's the first time we're featuring this brand new title in one of our benchmark features. Here is the breakdown of all 33 games tested, comparing the GTX 1660 and Radeon RX 590 at 1080p. Ethics Statement Terms of Use Privacy Policy Change Ad Consent Advertise. We don’t expect a true GTX 1660 Ti competitor from AMD until Navi drops. This chart compares the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti with the most popular Graphics Cards over the last 30 days. Perhaps one of the key findings from this review compared to what we saw a week ago is not simply the number of games tested, but because Nvidia clearly undercut the competition, a week has been enough time for AMD to react and adjust prices, so our cost per frame comparison has seen some changes as well. However, the GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q was never intended to beat its more-powerful brother. The GTX 1660 pushed our test system's consumption to 262 watts. Otherwise, as we just saw there are far more games where the GTX 1660 gets the better of the Radeon GPU. Grafikkarten-Rangliste 2020 mit Nvidia- und AMD-Grafikkarten (März): In der Benchmark-Übersicht von PCGH werden alle wichtigen Grafikchips von … Our usual GPU test system was used, equipped with a Core i9-9900K clocked at 5 GHz with 32GB of DDR4-3200 memory. So while the performance margin has shrunk a little, the new Turing GPU still came out on top and did so winning by a 5% margin or greater in 16 of the 33 games tested. The GTX 1660 is only able to match the GTX 1060 6GB at 1080p, making it quite a bit slower than the Radeon competition. Given it’s a little slower than the 1660 but costs about the same, it’s not quite as good in terms of value. MSI's GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Gaming X 6G is exceptional at doing what it's designed to do: deliver a moderate-cost GPU option to gamers in search of high refresh rates in 1080p. Meanwhile, the GTX 1660 Ti was slightly faster or a match for Vega 56 in Assassin’s Creed Odyssey, Fortnite, Vermintide 2 and Apex Legends. GeForce GTX 1660 Ti 6GB is best suited for resolutions up to and including 2560x1440, but is ideally suited for 1080p gaming. See how an RTX 2080 Ti's gaming performance compares to a new card after 18 months of mining. Nvidia GeForce GTX 1660 Ti review - PC Gamer. The smaller the overlap between the yellow and green bars, the better the value for money. For those of you who missed it, our day one review of the GTX 1660 featured a dozen games, many of which were recently released titles and there the new GPU came out looking like a champ. Warframe has the GTX 1660 offering a small performance gain over the GTX 1060 6GB as well as the RX 590. For the RTX 2060 comparison we see similar margins to our original review. Although it's too early for a review, here are some initial benchmarks from the new Surface Book 3 15-inch with a Core i7 and NVIDIA GeForce 1660 Ti (Max-Q) and how it … Now in our 33 game test the 1660 Ti came out exactly level with the 1070. We can observe that the GTX 1660 is good for 68 fps on average at 1080p using the ultra quality preset. This graph gives us a good idea of where Turing is more efficient than Pascal and, of course, Turing is faster under all conditions. DiRT 4 using CMAA is an AMD special, but even so the GTX 1660 Ti was able to match the RX 590, providing the same experience. The focus was on new titles such as Shadow of the Tomb Raider, Apex Legends, Resident Evil 2 and Hitman 2, all of which heavily favored the 1660 Ti. The margin dropped from 21% in our initial 12 game sample (day one review) to just 14% with all 33 games. The new GTX 1660 Ti graphics card tested in nine games at 1080p, 1440p and 4K resolutions by Digital Foundry. It was pretty shocking to see the GTX 1660’s lead over the GTX 1060 6GB shrivel up from 21% to just 14%. The biggest change has come from the sheer volume of games tested. Assassin’s Creed: Odyssey is a bad title for AMD cards and here we see the GTX 1660 basically matching Vega 64. If you enjoy our content, please consider subscribing... You need to be a member to leave a comment. By Chris Angelini 21 November 2019 Comments (4) Next up we have Strange Brigade, another AMD sponsored title. But don’t expect to see that too often. Still, for that level of performance you’re usually better off with the Radeon RX 580. A quick update to our cost per frame graph. It was also 12% slower than Vega 56. The EVGA GTX 1660 Ti XC Overclocking. This time it plays nice with AMD hardware which makes better sense. The benchmark records that this system is using a GTX 1660 Ti (the 80 W laptop variant). When put against the Radeon Vega 56, the GTX 1660 Ti is 8% slower on average, though with more titles at hand we see a few examples where the GTX 1660 Ti was significantly slower: Warframe, Strange Brigade, Battlefield V, DiRT 4 and Resident Evil 2, for example. GTX 1660 vs. GTX 1660 Ti Finally when comparing head to head with the GTX 1660 Ti , the vanilla 1660 is 15% slower and that’s very much in line with the previous test which saw the non-Ti … This is our second look at the new GeForce GTX 1660. While not a bad result, it wasn't the card's best showing either. In Star Wars Battlefront II the GTX 1660 Ti demonstrates how it’s clearly a class ahead of the GTX 1060 6GB and RX 590, offering over 40% more performance. Next we have For Honor, here we see the GTX 1660 Ti creeping in just behind the GTX 1070, which meant it was also a few frames down on Vega 56. Not because we’re worried about the power bill, but because a more efficient graphics card is a quieter graphics card, and it’s also more friendly to other components in your case as it’s not dumping as much heat on them. Even though AMD has cut pricing to match the GTX 1660, they’ll need to do better than that for us to recommend the RX 590 over the GTX 1660. Testing with Warhammer Vermintide 2 sees the GTX 1660 Ti match Vega 56, and please note we're using the DirectX 11 API for testing. Zotac with their Gaming model, MSI has the Zentus, EVGA has the XC Black, Gigabyte is offering a base model OC card as well as a Mini-ITX version. Quite the opposite – it was built in order to provide similar performance at a lower power and heat output, which it does perfectly. The day-one review looked at a dozen of the more recently released games such as Resident Evil 2, Metro Exodus, Apex Legends, and many others. Meanwhile the RX 580 has gone from being the best value sub $250 option, to a somewhat tough sell. PC Build questions whether to choose AMD APU or AMD CPU, Rate my build - focus on gaming usage and value picks, Guidance requested regarding upgraded configuration of computer, Ad-free TechSpot experience while supporting our work. The day-one review … There are currently a number of 1660 Ti graphics cards available at the $280 MSRP. LaptopMedia.com Laptop GPU Specs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Laptop) From: Simeon Nikolov 15 April 2019 / 00:49 | 0 The focus will be on 1080p, which is the most popular resolution for this kind of GPU, but we've also tested at 1440p making the entire analysis every bit as comprehensive as you may want. While we don’t expect this expanded benchmark test to change much, it should serve as a decent buying guide for those tossing up between the GTX 1660 and perhaps the Radeon RX 580. We’ve got to retest Forza Horizon 4 to try and work out what’s going on there, but other than that the only other major outliers include Warframe, Metro Exodus and World of Tanks. Here the GTX 1660 is matching the RX 590 but surprisingly runs 3% slower than the old GTX 1060 6GB. When compared to other GeForce parts it matched the GTX 1070 and was just 11% slower than the RTX 2060. In our day-one coverage the 1660 Ti was ~2% faster on average against the GTX 1070 and because of that we noted performance to be basically the same overall. Even so it was still almost 30% faster than the RX 590 and GTX 1060 6GB. The $220 GTX 1660 was just 12% faster than the GTX 1060 6GB, but 28% speedier than the Radeon RX 590. We see much the same story at 1440p, and this means the GTX 1660 was 20% slower than the Ti version. For example, the GTX 1080 is 8% faster than the RTX 2070. Older games such as The Witcher 3, World of Tanks, Project Cars 2, and so on don’t hand the Turing architecture much of an advantage over Pascal. Today we're expanding the benchmark test to a grand total of 33 games to see how it stacks up to the likes of AMD's Radeon RX 580 and 590. For those of you planning on buying and keeping your graphics card for 2-3 years and have no idea how things will look even just 6-12 months down the track, power consumption is worth keeping in mind. For those coming from much older mid-range GPUs, your top choices are either the GTX 1660 Ti or Vega 56. This chart compares the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q with the most popular Graphics Cards over the last 30 days. It was also 42% faster than the RX 590. PC Build questions whether to choose AMD APU or AMD CPU, Rate my build - focus on gaming usage and value picks, Guidance requested regarding upgraded configuration of computer, Ad-free TechSpot experience while supporting our work. Compared to the faster RTX 2000 GPUs (e.g. Regardless, the 1660 was never intended to be an upgrade option for GTX 1060 owners, but perhaps it is a reasonable buy for those running older cards like the GTX 960, which we'll likely explore soon. We were keen to see how the 1660 Ti stacked up in a much wider range of games, so today we’re doing that. The first test in today's lineup is The Division 2. Nvidia GeForce GTX 1660 Ti 6GB Review: Turing Without the RTX The GeForce GTX 1660 Ti is the first not-for-ray-tracing Turing card. The new GPU does offer next tier performance for a small price premium. That’s a 12% saving compared to the RX 570 and almost 30% less than the RX 580 and 590. We really like the look of the MSI Ventus and we’ll try to get our hands on one very soon. Sniper Elite 4 is one of the few games that supports DirectX 12 and actually runs better using DX12. At 1440p it manages to close the gap to the GTX 1070, while Vega 56 gets a little further away. Components that offer the best value for money have great performance (yellow) and a low price (green). The Nvidia GeForce GTX 1660 Ti for laptops is a mobile graphics card that is based on the Turing architecture (TU116 chip). We also added 800MHz to the GDDR6 memory overclock and the full details of our overclocking experience is here.. Let’s check the performance results of 46 games with our games at factory-clocked and overclocked speeds using the EVGA GTX 1660 … TECHSPOT : Tech Enthusiasts, Power Users, Gamers, Ethics Statement Terms of Use Privacy Policy. Overall little has changed... the GTX 1660 Ti is only 9% more expensive than the RX 580 per frame, but 12% cheaper than the RX 590 and 22% cheaper than Vega 56, at the more typical $400 asking price. The GPU also matched Vega 56 and was 26% faster than the Radeon RX 590, but most crucially with the game's visual settings just about maxed out it provided a very playable 54 fps on average at 1440p. The GeForce GPU was on average 5% faster, down from an 8% win in our original 12 game test. Of course, it’s best to look at performance in the games you’ll be playing. Although the GTX 1660 Ti looks less appealing for GTX 1060 6GB owners in this massive benchmark comparison, a 34% performance boost on average is still nothing to scoff at. But overall performance was strong with 61 fps on average. It was also 15% slower than the GTX 1070. We see a dramatic difference when comparing to the previous generation GTX 1060. It was also just 16% slower than the GeForce GTX 1070 and Radeon RX Vega 56. If we were looking at power consumption for the graphics cards alone those margins would increase significantly, making it clear Turing GPUs are much better in this regard. The 1% low result was very solid, too, though it lagged behind the 1070 by a 9% margin which was a little surprising. Of course, we also saw times where the margin grew to 20% or more, and we saw that in half a dozen titles. Performance in Prey is a little down on what you might be expecting from the GTX 1660 Ti, though with 86 fps on average it was still well ahead of the RX 590 and GTX 1060 6GB. Components that offer the best value for money have great performance (yellow) and a low price (green). In our day-one review the GTX 1660 Ti came out 40% faster on average when compared to the GTX 1060 6GB at 1440p. The 1660 Ti is 24% faster here. Then compared to the RTX 2060, the cost per frame of the 1660 Ti is improved by 7%, so a solid result for the new GTX graphics card. It also wasn’t that much faster than the RX 590... well, it was 22% faster, but given we’ve seen it up around 40% at times, a 22% margin looks modest in this instance. Next up we have Strange Brigade which is kind of the opposite of what we just saw. Interestingly, whereas the RTX 2070 is a good bit faster than the GTX 1080, the GTX 1660 Ti is actually a little slower than the GTX 1070. If we were currently gaming with a GTX 1060 and were after something with a bit more punch, upgrading to a GTX 1660 Ti is worthy of consideration. But for the purpose of this article, we’re not interested in Radeon VII, rather Vega 56, RX 590 and RX 580 play more consequential roles in this comparison. However now we have included games such as Warframe, Shadow of War and half a dozen other titles that saw the 1660 Ti beat the 1060 by less than 30%, bringing that average down and making the GTX 1660 Ti 34% faster on average against the GTX 1060 6G, which in itself is not a bad result given it costs just 12% more. As it stands today, the GTX 1660 Ti has no competition for best value and overall package for the price. Every GPU tested in this title was good for over 100 fps on average, so it looks like the win is shared among all GPUs for this one. The GTX 1660 Ti the latest mid-range and mid-priced graphics card for gamers, succeeding the now two year old GTX 1060 6GB.As NVIDIA have tried to imply with their naming convention, performance of this 16 series GPU lies somewhere between their 10 series and 20 series but the 16 does not contain any of the recent RTX cores, which given the lack of RTX ready games, by … We completed all testing in the same test bed comprised of a Core i9-9900K clocked at 5 GHz with 32GB of DDR4-3200 memory. Join thousands of tech enthusiasts and participate. The only clear cut winner for AMD right now is the RX 570, but that’s roughly 25% slower than the GTX 1660 so they aren’t exactly in the same performance category. Finally when comparing head to head with the GTX 1660 Ti, the vanilla 1660 is 15% slower and that’s very much in line with the previous test which saw the non-Ti model come in 13% slower. At 1080p it was 11% faster than the similarly priced RX 590 and 18% faster than the older 6GB 1060. From what we saw in our test, the GTX 1660 Ti was consistently better than its Max-Q counterpart with around 15-20%. First up we have Assassin's Creed: Odyssey and despite being an AMD sponsored title it does prefer Nvidia hardware and we see that here as the GTX 1660 Ti is able to match Vega 64. Join thousands of tech enthusiasts and participate. Here the GTX 1070 was 16% faster than the 1660 Ti, in fact, the new budget Turing offering was only 9% faster than the GTX 1060 6GB, so a fairly disappointing result to end on for fans of Warframe. Screen Tearing or Input Lag? That said, the GTX 1660 Ti did trail the GTX 1070 by a small margin in this one. Previously the 1660 Ti was 12% slower, now with 33 games that margin is increased ever so slightly to 14%. Much the same is seen at 1440p, with the GeForce 1660 running behind the Radeon RX 570, so obviously not a great result for Nvidia in this title. The GTX 1660’s lead over the RX 590 shrunk, while the 590’s price also shrunk a little. The performance margin remains the same for the Radeon RX 590 comparison. This enabled a much better experience than either the RX 590 or 6GB GTX 1060. The CPU score of 4,590 points is just 160 points short of … The 1660 maintained a reasonable lead over the 1060 and RX 590/580 GPUs, but was seen slipping behind the Vega GPUs by a slim margin. The RX 590 has seen a heftier price cut with numerous models now available at $220. On the upside, changes are not dramatic, and GTX 1660 cards are indeed selling at the intended $220 MSRP already. As we had anticipated, we are following up to our GeForce GTX 1660 Ti review with an even more ample 33 game benchmark test. The RX 590 simply isn’t fast enough for the price, though we are finally starting to see some changes with some models dropping as low as $240, which does nudge closer in terms of cost per frame. TECHSPOT : Tech Enthusiasts, Power Users, Gamers, TechSpot is a registered trademark. The Radeon GPUs perform very well in this title, too, but even so the 1660 Ti dusted the RX 590 by a 23% margin. Kingdom Come Deliverance has the 1660 Ti sitting between the 1070 and 1070 Ti, making this new mid-range GPU ~14-15% slower than the more expensive RTX 2060 and Vega 56. The last game we’re discussing the results for is The Witcher 3. As we had anticipated, we are following up to our GeForce GTX 1660 Ti review with an even more ample 33 game benchmark test. Plus, in case those Vega owners didn't get the memo, Turing is pretty handy in DX12 and Vulkan titles now anyway. So it'd appear getting a decent model for the MSRP is not an issue. Performance wasn’t any better at 1440p, where the 1660 only matched the 1060, placing it roughly on par with the Radeon RX 590. A few Vega users complained that we were favoring Nvidia by using DX11, that’s not the intention but last we checked DX11 offered better frame time performance. Not to be confused with the 1660 Ti that was released a month earlier, both GPUs offer great value at mid-range prices of $220 for the GTX 1660 and $280 for the Ti version. F1 fans will appreciate what the GTX 1660 Ti has to offer for less than $300. The fact that the new GeForce GPU is some 30% faster in Assassin’s Creed Odyssey might not matter much if you predominantly play titles such as Strange Brigade, Battlefield V or Sniper Elite 4, to cite a few examples. Rather than using the canned benchmark we’ve recorded performance in-game. In this title we’re looking at GTX 1070 or Vega 56-like performance with a healthy 68 fps on average. If you're primary playing DiRT 4 or Battlefield V, then the RX 590 is a better choice. As it stands the GTX 1660 was 15% faster than the GTX 1060, but 8% slower than the RX 590. Notebookcheck.com reviews the Lenovo Legion Y540-15IRH again, but this time with an NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti GPU, along with 512 GB of storage. This made it 9% faster than the old Pascal-based GTX 1060. The performance summary and breakdown section includes the 12 games we already looked at along with the new 21 titles, and for 12 of those 21 titles we’ll analyze and comment the results more closely below. That’s a big difference and as suspected the 1660 generally does much better in newer titles. Only the Radeon VII saw a significant change in the 33 game sample, and here it stacks up much better than on the previous 12-game comparison. The smaller the overlap between the yellow and green bars, the better the value for money. As for drivers we used Adrenalin 2019 Edition 19.2.2 for the Radeon GPUs and Game Ready 418.91 WHQL for the GeForce GPUs. NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (Laptop) - benchmark tests, specifications and information. Meanwhile the RX 590 was faster by a 5% margin or greater in just 5 of the games. - Hardware Canucks. The RX 580 has dropped down from $200 to $190 which is not a huge deal, but still makes the Radeon a viable alternative for some. The GTX 1660 Ti the latest mid-range and mid-priced graphics card for gamers, succeeding the now two year old GTX 1060 6GB.As NVIDIA have tried to imply with their naming convention, performance of this 16 series GPU lies somewhere between their 10 series and 20 series but the 16 does not contain any of the recent RTX cores, which given the lack of RTX ready games, by … NVIDIA GTX 1660 Ti Review - The Fastest GPU for $279! Moving on to Monster Hunter: World, the GTX 1660 is able to match the RX 590. So in spite of a few pricing adjustments, our recommendation has not been altered from the original review. We recommend a mid … That figure drops down to just 46 fps at 1440p and while playable you’ll probably want to do some tweaking here to improve frame rates.
Chocolate Covered Cheese Crackers, 2004 Yz250 For Sale Craigslist, Nitrosyl Fluoride Lewis Structuremetaphors In Like Water For Chocolate, Green And White Spots On Bananas, Is Ncis: New Orleans On Netflix, Stash House Track Pants, Bigfoot Addon Mcpe, United States Taekwondo Grandmasters Society, How To Descale De'longhi Coffee Pod Machine,